|
Aug 10
2010
|
Green deal for housing must put homeowners firstPosted by: Ben Ross Tagged in: Green Deal , Energy Saving , Energy Bill , Eco-Refurb , Design , Coalition Government , Climate Change , Bristol
|
|
The last couple of years have seen huge interest in tackling the energy use and carbon emissions of the UK’s existing housing stock, and it’s been a real pleasure to be a part of that movement. I’ve met some amazing people from the public, private and NGO sectors but few more inspirational than the homeowners who are leading the way.
Since 2009 we’ve been working with pioneers living in a variety of properties with a shared passion to reduce the energy and resource consumption of their homes. Refit West is part of Forum for the Future’s work to make Bristol and the West of England the most sustainable city-region in the UK, and we want to develop a practical model for ‘whole house’ energy efficiency refurbishment which can be rolled out across the country.
Our approach begins and ends with the homeowner: providing information on the most appropriate and cost-effective options for their property; designing solutions to meet their needs; ensuring suppliers give them quality and value for their money; and making capital finance available at terms that benefit them as owners. It’s all about empowering and supporting individuals as they make decisions and commission work on their homes. Never assume these are just houses we’re talking about – we are extremely emotionally attached to our housing stock. The information currently available to homeowners is at best complex and at worst contradictory. The homeowners we are working with in Refit West, have committed their time to making sense of it and to take action that will disrupt their homes and lives for a period of time, but this is enough to put many off refurbishing their homes. We’ve helped these pioneers overcome many of the common barriers and it’s significant that, while some of the solutions and ‘whole house packages’ are becoming clearer, no two customer journeys have been the same. We need to learn from the experience of these few in order to stand a chance of building a scheme that delivers for the many.
Our homes generate a quarter of the UK’s carbon footprint and making them more energy efficient is one of the most cost-effective ways to cut carbon. Our homeowners’ experience helps to explain why, despite numerous national and local initiatives, residential carbon emissions have only fallen by 6% since 1990. We desperately need to move from making 3% cuts each decade to 3% a year to meet our national carbon targets. The Committee on Climate Change wants the built environment to be near zero carbon by 2050.
Home energy efficiency is rightly seen as a political priority across all parties, and the forthcoming Energy Bill promises to provide the structures for long-term carbon reduction. But will it really deliver? Will it champion and support those pioneers and early adopters who are crucial in developing and building support for mass programmes that can refurbish a million homes a year? Or will it simply create another market opportunity for large commercial interests to cherry pick the easiest works at the expense of a long-term strategic approach?
The answer is being written in Whitehall right now. I believe achieving the carbon reductions required from our 27 million homes will take a cross-departmental approach to make your head spin...DECC, HCA, BIS, Defra, the devolved administrations of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland and significantly the Treasury. It’s great to see two parties working on this together but will we see the coalition work right across government to deliver on our national objectives and in our collective interest?
Related Articles/Posts
- laughter, wry smiles, contemplation and sheer bafflement
- SuperHome under construction
- The Green Deal Webinar – Knauf Insulation perspective
- Afterthought on our webinar
- Green Deal Webinar– one year and counting...
- dissecting the Green Deal - GBR webinar
- Pay as You Save – Gentoo’s story
- Energy Bill is still inadequate
- Green Deal should not be the only game in town
- How to spend a Bank Holiday

written by Simon McWhirter, GB Refurb Campaign Director, September 05, 2010
Thanks for contacting us. We weren't able to incorporate historic building questions into that particular piece of work but on our GBR twitter account I have recently been posting some useful links along these lines:
1. More info on refurbing historic buildings http://www.princes-regeneratio...-buildings
2. some info on period house refurbs http://tinyurl.com/39ysost
Also, we're looking to link in with English Heritage to access their great work on this front.
We'll keep you posted
Cheers
written by Rob Willan, September 10, 2010
The Green Deal, like so much from the Government over the last 20 years (HIPs tax credits etc) is too complicated. The question at the 75% point in the survey is too complicated. £100 saving on home retrofitting is pathetic - That's one food shop. If I spend £20000 retrofitting insulation and installing renewable energy, firstly I would NOT expect to 17.5% of my spend to go back to the Chancellor in the form of VAT!! Second, I would expect, say savings of 1/3rd on my current fuel bill ie £500/year minimum giving me a payback time of 40 years!! I will be dead then.
We have just retrofitted 100 mm insulation, plus membrane, to a flat roof, costing us £5000. £735 of that was in the form of VAT!! HMRC on their website say "When you have certain energy saving materials and equipment installed on your house, you'll be charged a lower rate of VAT" I queried my bill with the roofer and he said the full rate of VAT was charged to him by his supplier. Last year when I insulated under suspended timber floors, I too was charged 17.5% on the rigid board insulation, despite me arguing with the supplier. From January we will be paying 20% VAT on all retrofitting work.
So the 10% subsidy is pathetic - the Government charges up front and offers a pittance back. If they really want zero carbon housing by 2016, then all energy-saving materials, plus the labour and making-good required to retrofit should be zero VAT-rated. This should have been on your survey. It should be in every article on energy saving.
You should have a link on your website to: www.hmrc.gov.uk/vat/sectors/co...saving.htm Please could someone at the Great British Refurb campaign investigate why VAT is being charged on energy-saving materials and report back?






Is there any evidence that any of those concerned in developing this idea have given the problems of listed building owners any consideration at all?